{"id":90334,"date":"1999-12-31T00:59:00","date_gmt":"1999-12-30T13:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/smartoffice.com.au\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/"},"modified":"1999-12-31T00:59:00","modified_gmt":"1999-12-30T13:59:00","slug":"dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/","title":{"rendered":"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dodgy door to door vacum cleaner Company Lux has been wacked with a $370,000 fine by the Federal Court for unconscionable conduct following investigation into their selling practises.<\/p>\n<div><span style=\"font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">The Federal Court has ordered Lux Distributors Pty Ltd (Lux) pay pecuniary penalties totalling $370,000 in proceedings brought by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.<\/span><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">The Court&#8217;s orders follow declarations by the Full Court of the Federal Court in August 2013 that Lux had engaged in unconscionable conduct when selling vacuum cleaners to three elderly women.<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">The sales occurred after a Lux sales representative called on the women in their homes under the premise of a free vacuum cleaner maintenance check, but with the purpose of selling a vacuum cleaner. The women were then subjected to unfair sales tactics, and pressured into purchasing a vacuum cleaner.&nbsp;<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">&#8220;The substantial penalties imposed against Lux reflect the nature of the breaches, which involved taking advantage of a &#8220;deliberate ruse&#8221; to gain access to consumers&#8217; homes and then engaging in pressure sales tactics so that these vulnerable consumers agreed to make a purchase,&#8221; ACCC Commissioner Sarah Court said.<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">&#8220;The Full Court noted in its judgment in 2013 that consumer protection laws reinforce societal values and expectations that consumers will be dealt with honestly and fairly, and without deception.&#8221;<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">&#8220;As the national consumer protection regulator, consumer protection issues that affect vulnerable members of the community and unconscionable conduct are priority areas for the ACCC,&#8221; Ms Court said.<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">The Court also made orders for injunctions preventing Lux from engaging in similar conduct in the future and requiring the establishment of a compliance and education program for all Lux employees and its agents.<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">Background<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">The ACCC instituted proceedings against Lux in May 2012. The ACCC alleged that between 2009 and 2011, Lux engaged in unconscionable conduct in relation to the sale of vacuum cleaners to five elderly consumers in contravention of section 51AB of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and section 21 of the Australian Consumer Law.<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">In February 2013, Justice Jessup dismissed the ACCC&#8217;s Application, finding that Lux had not engaged in unconscionable conduct during its dealings with the consumers.<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\"><br \/><\/span><\/font><\/div>\n<div><font face=\"sans-serif\"><span style=\"font-size: 13.3333330154419px;\">The ACCC appealed the decision in relation to three of the consumers, and in August 2013 the Full Court of the Federal Court found that Lux had engaged in unconscionable conduct in respect of each of the three elderly consumers.<\/span><\/font><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dodgy door to door vacum cleaner Company Lux has been wacked with a $370,000 fine by the Federal Court for unconscionable conduct following investigation into their selling practises.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"gallery","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28,51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-gallery","hentry","category-archive","category-marketing","post_format-post-format-gallery"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods - Smart Office<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods - Smart Office\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Dodgy door to door vacum cleaner Company Lux has been wacked with a $370,000 fine by the Federal Court for unconscionable conduct following investigation into their selling practises.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Smart Office\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1999-12-30T13:59:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"David Richards\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"David Richards\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"David Richards\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#\/schema\/person\/6ed028a8569636ee2d70d979fa540e66\"},\"headline\":\"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods\",\"datePublished\":\"1999-12-30T13:59:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/\"},\"wordCount\":396,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Archive\",\"Marketing\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/\",\"name\":\"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods - Smart Office\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1999-12-30T13:59:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/\",\"name\":\"Smart Office\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Smart Office\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Smart-Office-Logo-Final-Yellow-1_page-0001.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Smart-Office-Logo-Final-Yellow-1_page-0001.jpg\",\"width\":1359,\"height\":477,\"caption\":\"Smart Office\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#\/schema\/person\/6ed028a8569636ee2d70d979fa540e66\",\"name\":\"David Richards\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"David Richards\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/author\/david-richards\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods - Smart Office","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods - Smart Office","og_description":"Dodgy door to door vacum cleaner Company Lux has been wacked with a $370,000 fine by the Federal Court for unconscionable conduct following investigation into their selling practises.","og_url":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/","og_site_name":"Smart Office","article_published_time":"1999-12-30T13:59:00+00:00","author":"David Richards","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"David Richards","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/"},"author":{"name":"David Richards","@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#\/schema\/person\/6ed028a8569636ee2d70d979fa540e66"},"headline":"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods","datePublished":"1999-12-30T13:59:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/"},"wordCount":396,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Archive","Marketing"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/","url":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/","name":"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods - Smart Office","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#website"},"datePublished":"1999-12-30T13:59:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/1999\/12\/31\/dodgy-appliance-distributor-wacked-with-370000-fine-for-questionable-vacum-cleaner-sales-methods\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dodgy Appliance Distributor Wacked With $370,000 Fine For Questionable Vacum Cleaner Sales Methods"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#website","url":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/","name":"Smart Office","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#organization","name":"Smart Office","url":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Smart-Office-Logo-Final-Yellow-1_page-0001.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Smart-Office-Logo-Final-Yellow-1_page-0001.jpg","width":1359,"height":477,"caption":"Smart Office"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/#\/schema\/person\/6ed028a8569636ee2d70d979fa540e66","name":"David Richards","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"David Richards"},"url":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/author\/david-richards\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/42"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90334"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90334\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/staging.strixdevelopment.net\/smartoffice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}